Hi Wayne,

Wayne Fay wrote:

> Not sure how I missed seeing that, I really think it wasn't there the
> other day... :)
> 
> And I'd **love** to use a more official version... I ran into this
> because I was trying to explore Xdoclet a bit (and xdoclet-plugin-ejb
> and xdoclet-plugin-web). At some point, I ran into a failure due to
> xpp3:xpp3:1.1.3.4-RC8_min:jar.
> 
> After some more diagnosis, I found the problem poms:
> nanocontainer/nanocontainer/1.0-RC-3/nanocontainer-1.0-RC-3.pom
> picocontainer/picocontainer/1.2-RC-2/picocontainer-1.2-RC-2.pom
> 
> Both are brought in by xdoclet-2.0.5-SNAPSHOT and both refer to xpp3
> 1.1.3.4-RC8_min.
> 
> <dependency>
>   <groupId>picocontainer</groupId>
>   <artifactId>picocontainer</artifactId>
>   <version>1.2-RC-2</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>   <groupId>nanocontainer</groupId>
>   <artifactId>nanocontainer</artifactId>
>   <version>1.0-RC-3</version>
> </dependency>
> 
> Thanks for the link to that bug. Now that xpp3 is getting cleaned up a
> bit, I'm sure other poms will start referring to the proper
> build/release etc.

Pico/Nano is still using Maven 1, so the POMs for M2 are generated
automatically by the repository mapper. Additionally the "official" version
1.1.3.4.O was added last week, so it will take some time until all
artifacts change their deps. Next Pico/Nano release will use a more
official version for certainty.

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to