I just went through this process this month. When I started I was using maven 2.0 for my builds. Cruisecontrol did not have full support for it.(I thought) So I started playing with Continuum, not as easy to setup as Cruisecontrol.
After about a week playing with Continuum, I decided I just liked Cruisecontrol better. Then started to look for the support for maven 2.0 in Cruisecontrol, I found the Maven 2.0 patch in one day. Copied, compiled, and installed ...... It works great! Just my opinion! On 2/21/06, Adrian Herscu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jonathan, thanks for your fast reply. > Finally, I have found a comparison here: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix > But, still I do not understand what is the "tighter integration with > Maven 2" all about. Using CC I still can invoke Maven (1 or 2 -- does it > matter?) through the shell interface -- isn't it? > > Johnson, Jonathan wrote: > > If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl. > > > > Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have > > CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum. > > > > I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which > > will grow hopefully with the Continuum and Maven 2 feature sets. In > > addition I opted for Continuums tighter integration with Maven 2. > > > > If the feature sets were the same I would recommend Continuum because of > > it tighter integration with Maven 2. > > > > Many of the feature you might expect to find in Continuum are really in > > Maven 2 (where they should be, well.. at least when they are written as > > a plugin for Maven 2). Be careful of comparing the apples to oranges. > > Be aware that Maven 2 and Continuum have only been around for a few > > months and more features are anticipated this year. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu > > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 2:59 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Why Continuum? > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am trying to find the answer to this question with no success. > > Currently, I am using CruiseControl -- why should I (or others like me) > > switch to Continuum? > > > > Adrian. > > > > > > LEGAL NOTICE: > > Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may > be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this > e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any > disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in > reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an > addressee, please inform the sender immediately. > > > > > > > >
