I agree. You shoudn't specify a plugin version unless you really need to (for instance you want to use a snapshot version). This way Maven will tell you when there is a new version released and ask you if you want to install it and use it from now on.
On 3/11/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry about the /src/tests mistake -- you're right, the correct > directory is /src/test. > > I'm not specifying the version number as you are... > Mine > <plugin> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> > <artifactId>surefire-report-maven-plugin</artifactId> > </plugin> > > Yours: > <plugin> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> > <artifactId>surefire-report-maven-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.0-beta-1</version> > </plugin> > > > Perhaps this is causing your issue? I'm not sure what the most recent > release is but according to my local user repo I've got: > 2.0-20060106.225541-3 > 2.0-alpha-2 > 2.0-beta-4 > 2.0-SNAPSHOT > > Without specifying a version, I'm getting > maven-site-plugin:2.0-beta-4. I'd assume there are updates between > beta-1 and beta-4 that you are missing, which is leading to some of > your troubles. > > Wayne > > > On 3/10/06, Miguel Griffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I alsgo have all test classes named FooTest > > but the dir is src/test/java (note singluar test, not plural) > > > > however, if I run mvn test, it will take 20' to run all tests, but when I > > run site, tests are run, but report says 0 tests. > > I noticed there are not TESTfoo.xml in the generated reports dir, but I > > guess that should be automatic, shouldn't it? > > you didn't have to set anything special, did you? > > > > plugin is defined like this > > > > <reporting> > > <plugins> > > <plugin> > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> > > <artifactId>surefire-report-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > <version>2.0-beta-1</version> > > </plugin> > > > > > > > > On 3/10/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I also use it with zero issues. Tests are in src/tests/java and named > > > BlahVOTest.java with methods setUp, tearDown, and testBlah1, > > > testBlah2, etc. > > > > > > I can only think you are doing something strange, Miguel. ;-) > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > On 3/10/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I use it without any problems. What are you test methods names ? > > > > textXXX ? Or you prefer to use test suites? > > > > > > > > On 3/10/06, Miguel Griffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > anyone being able to use surfire test report in m2? > > > > > I have a project with 2000+ tests, with m2 dir layout and test report > > > says > > > > > all zero... > > > > > any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Miguel Griffa > > > > > Skype: miguel.griffa > > > > > Y!: m_griffa > > > > > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Cell: 15-62519355 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Alexandre Poitras > > > > Québec, Canada > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Miguel Griffa > > Skype: miguel.griffa > > Y!: m_griffa > > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cell: 15-62519355 > > > > > -- Alexandre Poitras Québec, Canada --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
