I don't use M1 at all, so take this for what its worth...

Is there a reason you cannot download the Maven 1.0.2 sources from
SVN, update the Jelly libraries to eliminate the memory leak issue,
and produce your own internal 1.0.3 version? I don't know how much
work it would be to update the libraries, but assuming the API didn't
change, this might be a simple thing (?).

I strongly doubt you will get any substantial support on M102 at this
time from anyone outside of your own organization.

Wayne


On 3/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Arnaud,
>
> Thanks for the kind and sincere answer ....  We all unfortunately must
> compromise resources and feutures ... If you could drive us to the point
> where we could mantain at least this level of compatibility that we require
> that would be very much appreciated ...
>
> Best Regards
>
> Michele
>
>
>
>             "Arnaud HERITIER"
>             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>             m>
>
>
>             27/03/2006 13:38
>             Please respond to
>             "Maven Users List"                                                
>                                            To
>             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         "Maven Users List" 
> <[email protected]>
>             .org>                                                             
>                                            cc
>
>                                                                               
>                                       Subject
>                                         Re: How to transit from Maven 1.0.2 
> to Maven 2 , what is the role of Maven 1.x ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Michele,
>
> This is essentially a problem of ressources.
> We try with with very few developers to release a version 1.1 as much
> compatible as possible but it's not really easy.
> We know that the fact to remove is support of entities is really annoying
> but we didn't yet find an easy solution to maintain it.
> If your interesting to help us, you're welcome...
> Personally I don't have the time to maintain a new 1.0.X branch...
> There's a lot of enhancements in the version 1.1 and I prefer that we work
> together on a fix for this version.
>
> Cheers
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
>
> On 3/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To whom may concern,
> >
> > A general consideration on this topic: that I believe to be a general
> > problem.
> > Any of us which have for whatever reason done an investment in Maven
> 1.0.2
> > ,
> > pretty heavy as
> > in our case , are at moment in a kind of Limbo.
> >
> > We found inherent bugs in the Maven 1.0.2, that is not know where and if
> > will be solved : namely memory leak due to buggy version of Jelly
> > libraries
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1294. That for small project is not
> > visible but when you start using multiprojects of more then 20 components
> > and
> > run reports and use the dashboard for aggregating the results than you
> hit
> > the upper physical memory management of the JDKs  ...
> > On the other side that bug is claimed to be solved since Maven
> 1.1-Betaand
> > as Maven 1.1 claims to be backward compatible that would be the natural
> > next try ....
> >
> > But there you find that the Entities are no longer supported ..... show
> > stopper :-(
> >
> > I understand the new concept implemented in Maven 2.x ... and it makes
> > definitely sense ... but we need a sort of continuous support to maintain
> > our investment ... and on the other side a big bang migration is not in
> > scope when in your landscape you have more than 50 application to
> mantain.
> >
> > A simple solution would be to allow those which have such a need to move
> > to Maven 1.1 and still using entities ... knowing anyway that if a
> > restructuring is needed Maven 2 is there ....another solution could be to
> > fix the Jelly problem directly in the 1.0.x stream ?
> >
> > Any help to clarify those points will be greatly accepted ...
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Michele
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the person(s) or
> > company named and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
> > information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information
> > may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > please delete this message and notify the sender
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the person(s) or
> company named and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
> information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information
> may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please delete this message and notify the sender
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to