Just want to confirm, Gunther's setup works.  I force a bad missing artifact
and maven output shows it only
search my internal repo


On 4/14/06, dan tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Did i mention it is a hacked solution? :-)
>
> BTW, the way m2 shows build output is very confused, when an missing
> artifact occurs,
> it shows repo1 got searched first.
>
> -D
>
>
> On 4/14/06, Gunther Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, what´s wrong with my solution? Redefining a repo using the id
> > "central"? This works fine and is, IMO, a normal usage of the
> > POM-inheritance of Maven (with pom-4.0.0.xml as implicit parent pom).
> >
> > Changing the hosts file would be necessary on every single developer
> > workstation, so I´m not sure if this is really better.
> >
> > Gunther
> >
> >
> > dan tran schrieb:
> > > this is  a hacked solution, fixup your hosts file and route
> > > repo1.apache.orgto your internal host
> > >
> > > -D
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/14/06, Gunther Popp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hmm, I´ve been monitoring this thread (and it´s predecessor) for a
> > while
> > >> am still not sure what´s wrong with your setup. From all I´ve read,
> > it
> > >> should work. I´m using internal repositories for a while now, without
> >
> > >> any problems. Here´s my definition of repositories I´m using in my
> > POM:
> > >>
> > >> <!-- Definition privater Repositories -->
> > >> <repositories>
> > >>    <repository>
> > >>      <id>central</id>
> > >>      <name>Privates Repository für externe Bibliotheken</name>
> > >>      <url>http://localhost/mvnrepos/lib </url>
> > >>      <releases>
> > >>        <enabled>true</enabled>
> > >>        <updatePolicy>daily</updatePolicy>
> > >>      </releases>
> > >>      <snapshots>
> > >>        <enabled>false</enabled>
> > >>      </snapshots>
> > >>    </repository>
> > >> </repositories>
> > >>
> > >> <pluginRepositories>
> > >>     <pluginRepository>
> > >>       <id>central</id>
> > >>       <name>Privates Repository für Plugins</name>
> > >>       <url>http://localhost/mvnrepos/plugin </url>
> > >>       <releases>
> > >>         <enabled>true</enabled>
> > >>         <updatePolicy>daily</updatePolicy>
> > >>       </releases>
> > >>       <snapshots>
> > >>         <enabled>false</enabled>
> > >>       </snapshots>
> > >>     </pluginRepository>
> > >>   </pluginRepositories>
> > >>
> > >> Maybe you´ll find a difference to your setup. Just a note: A
> > potential
> > >> problem arises, if a POM in the repository defines a parent POM _and_
> > >> redefines the central-repository using http://repo1.maven.org/maven2,
> > >> too. In this case it is possible that Maven still accesses the
> > default
> > >> repository url to download the parent POMs. But AFAIK that´s not true
> > >> for the POM of the resources-plugin.
> > >>
> > >> CU,
> > >>
> > >> Gunther
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> EJ Ciramella schrieb:
> > >>
> > >>> Take about 10 steps back and a deep breath - the problem is that the
> > >>>
> > >> security forces that be don't like the fact that anything can be
> > placed up
> > >> there ( http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) and then pulled down.
> > >>
> > >>> In addition to this, why oh why is maven downloading something
> > remotely
> > >>>
> > >> that exist within our four walls?
> > >>
> > >>> How do I stop this?
> > >>>
> > >>> E:\work\foxboro\model>mvn process-resources
> > >>> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> > >>> [INFO]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > >>
> > >>> [INFO] Building LtyModel
> > >>> [INFO]    task-segment: [process-resources]
> > >>> [INFO]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > >>
> > >>> [INFO] artifact
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:checking for updates
> > from local-central
> > >>> [INFO] artifact
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:checking for updates
> > from central
> > >>> Downloading:
> > >>>
> > >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-resources-plugin/2.1/maven-resources-plugin-2.1.pom
> >
> > >>
> > >>> 888b downloaded
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from local-central
> > >>
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from central
> > >>
> > >>> Downloading:
> > >>>
> > >>
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/2.0.1/maven-compiler-plugin-2.0.1.pom
> > >>
> > >>> 1K downloaded
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from local-central
> > >>
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from central
> > >>
> > >>> Downloading:
> > >>>
> > >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/2.1.3/maven-surefire-plugin-2.1.3.pom
> >
> > >>
> > >>> 1K downloaded
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from local-central
> > >>
> > >>> [INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:checking
> > >>>
> > >> for updates from central
> > >>
> > >>> Downloading:
> > >>>
> > >>
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/2.0-beta-3/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.0-beta-3.pom
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Gunther Popp [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:51 PM
> > >>> To: Maven Users List
> > >>> Subject: Re: use of proxies
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> The first question is: why?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> Sorry, for jumping in here, but a common reason is to guarantee
> > >>> reproducible builds over a fairly long period of time. For example,
> > the
> > >>> systems I´m engaged with have a typical lifetime of 15-20 years.
> > When
> > >>> the software is considered stable after initial development, a team
> > of
> > >>> maintenance developers will implement enhancements and fix bugs.
> > These
> > >>> guys are typically responsible for several systems and have no time
> > to
> > >>> hassle around with build tools. So the build process simply should
> > work.
> > >>>
> > >>> You cannot guarantee this, if your build relies on any form of
> > external
> > >>> resource that is not under your direct control. Even if I use
> > explicit
> > >>> version numbering for plugins and dependencies, the corresponding
> > >>> artifacts simply may disappear on iblio in five years from now. Or,
> > >>> another scenario, maybe the repository layout changes in Maven 3 or
> > 4
> > >>> and "legacy" Maven 2 repositories are only supported until 2010. At
> > this
> > >>> time it is to expensive and risky to upgrade the build process for a
> >
> > >>> running mission-critical system to a completely new version of
> > Maven.
> > >>> Nobody will fund this.
> > >>>
> > >>> So, the only way to prevent this is to use strictly internal
> > >>> repositories. This means additional effort, of course, and only pays
> > off
> > >>> if you really have use case for it. But these use cases certainly
> > exist.
> > >>>
> > >>> CU,
> > >>>
> > >>> Gunther
> > >>>
> > >>> Barrie Treloar schrieb:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 4/13/06, EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> All I'm attempting to do is prevent builds from going to the maven
> > >>>>>
> > >> repository.  I have set up one machine ( build.corp.upromise.com)
> > that has
> > >> everything from my .m2/repository directory (I copied it there).
> > >>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> The first question is: why?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Maven manages your build dependencies. Use version numbers in your
> > pom
> > >>>> dependencies to lock down what should be used instead of
> > restricting
> > >>>> access to central.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to