On 6/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know I'd find this useful as well, for several reasons:
-If you simply let continuum build every 5 mins, there could potentially be
more than 1 commit during that time, and you would be building multiple
revisions worth of changes. Ideally, you would want to build once/revision so
if the build breaks, you know which commit broke it.
You are not considering here the time that it takes to build the project.
a commits
continuum starts building
b commits
continuum can't start building, busy
c commits
continuum can't start building, busy
continuum finishes building
continuum starts building b and c changes
-The continuum server would not be making as many hits to the svn server. If
you're building dozens and dozens of projects, this adds up when it's once
every 5 mins.
I don't realy know what is the overhead of getting the revision number
to check for changes but shouldn't be heavy at all
If you got rather fancy, it would sure be nice to have the commit check if
there were new projects added, and automagically add them to continuum as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez
Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 1:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Subversion post-commit hook
why do you need that, setting a short period like 5 min is not enough?
On 6/8/06, Chris Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'd like to trigger Continuum builds upon developer commits in
> Subversion. It sounds like to do so we need to develop an xml-rpc
> client.
>
> Has anyone developed a post-commit hook into Continuum from Subversion?
> Is there related documentation available?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
