One of their difference is that assembly:assembly is binded to package
phase ( Im not sure if binded is the right term for a mojo that has
@execute phase)
while the assembly:attached doesnt. When using <executions> the
asembly:attached is more appropriate to use.
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
can anyone explain me the difference between assembly:assembly and
assembly:attached?
Background: I am looking for a workaround to MNG-1682. I'll quote my comment
from there.
The attached project can be used to reproduce the problem. When
"install" is invoked in the subproject, then the "assembly:assembly"
goal is executed. This is not the case when "install" is invoked in
the parent project.
Thanks,
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
