http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.0.3-SNAPSHOT/maven-model/maven.html#class_project
"groupId : A universally unique identifier for a project. It is normal to use a fully-qualified package name to distinguish it from other projects with a similar name (eg. org.apache.maven)." It's common practice to use the top package name as groupId for the artifact. Which could lead to a typo error in your case. But it seems it's not the case and the names are different on purpose (whatever this purpose is). So, safe from a typo, I don't really see why this wouldn't work.... Jeff Mutonho wrote: > > I don't understand how my package names inside the class can/should > relate to groupIds > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-maven-seeing-another-jar--tf1954355.html#a5360715 Sent from the Maven - Users forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
