That's a question for the Jakarta commons-logging mailing lists.
-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoffrey De Smet
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: commons-logging-api vs commons-logging
In the central repo there are 2 jars for commons-logging.
On which one should I depend or should I depend on both?
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-logging-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
<version>1.0.4</version>
</dependency>
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments
are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the
addressee. The information contained in this message is
confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information
under international, federal, or state securities laws.
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of
such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and
notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call
Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1)
(816)221-1024. -------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
