Well,, I think we need to look in the aspectJ code to find the outputs that do not go trough their logger callback,or perhaps I have overlooked a methodcall there in my logger, but let us continue this discussion on the mojo user group.
/K On 18/08/06, Nick Veys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any hint as to what needs to be done? I'd be glad to help out, I couldn't see much on the ajc docs as to how to make it quieter as it is already run w/o -verbose. On 8/18/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15/08/06, Nick Veys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed the M2 version of the aspectj plugin is a lot louder than > > the M1 one. It lists every file as it compiles regardless if verbose > > is set or not. The major difference I see is that M2 uses ajc's > > bridge classes while M1 uses the iajc ant task. > > > > Is there a way to get M2's aspectj plugin to be a bit quieter? Not a > > huge deal of course, it seems ajc likes to talk. > > Work on that is on the way, but it is not a prioritized task. > But yah.. ajc loves to talk ;) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
