Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up
the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib?
I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so
including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve
the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c
you won't get access to them anyway)?
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something like
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.2-20060829.202242-1</version>
<configuration>
<archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<pluginRepositories>
<pluginRepository>
<id>apache.org</id>
<name>Apache Snapshot Repository</name>
<url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository</url>
<releases>
<enabled>false</enabled>
</releases>
</pluginRepository>
</pluginRepositories>
On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > > > > my IDE.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars.
> > > >
> > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > > > > war:inplace.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > > > > is a good one?
> > > > >
> > > > > appfuse2
> > > > > - data
> > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > > > > - hibernate
> > > > > - ibatis
> > > > > - service
> > > > > - web
> > > > > - common
> > > > > - common-war
> > > > > - jsf
> > > > > - jsf-war
> > > > > - spring
> > > > > - spring-war
> > > > > - struts
> > > > > - struts-war
> > > > > - tapestry
> > > > > - tapestry-war
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > > > > the war-overlay feature.
> > > >
> > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
> > >
> > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
> > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
> > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
> > > patch myself.
> >
> >
> > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in
svn
>
> Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about
> checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this
> documented somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it
doesn't
> > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are
there
> > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/
a
> > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
