I rigged up a test. The chart is accurate, but the behavior seems wrong to me. Could someone please explain why dropping that dependency is the right thing to do?
Just to repeat, here is the setup: Project depends on A with test scope. A depends on B with provided scope. When I run A's tests, I have B in my classpath. When I run Project's tests, I don't have B in my classpath. Is there any use case when it's good not to have B? Since we're still just running unit tests, we can't get B otherwise than from maven. Thanks, Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/test-scope-should-inherit-provided-scope--tf2435171.html#a6790794 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
