[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I'm not sure if this is the correct answer, but I had the same problem
(although with SourceSafe), and as far as I could understand it, it was
due to
the fact that when you trigger the build, you check out the source code,
which includes the POM file.
Since the POM file in cvs contains the old scm url, it overwrites the one
in the build definition, although I'm not really sure why. I almost went
nuts over this until I
figured it out.
My solution was to modify the POM file, check it in, then either change
the build definition or remove and add the project again.
It has worked flawless ever since.
Yes, it's the correct solution. scm informations in pom must be correct.
Emmanuel
Regards
Joakim Zetterberg
Eric Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2007-02-02 01:06:07:
Hi,
I am trying to get continuum working to see if it will do a better job
than
our current cruisecontrol setup. The version of continuum I am usingis
1.0.3
and I cannot get a reliable build from it.
The POM contains a SCM connection string like the following:
scm:cvs:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/path/to/module
which works fine for Maven.
When I added the project and triggered a build, it failed with the error
that
a password was needed. According to the FAQ, the SCM URL should be
changed
to :anonymous:@cvsserver: so I did this and the build worked. So far so
good...
I then triggered another build and it failed again with the initial
error.
Going back to check the project info, I notice that the original SCM URL
has
replaced my modified version. Has anyone else seen, and hopefully found
a
reason for, this lacy of persistence of a project configuration?
A second issue is that the port number in my URL causes problems,
and I end up
with messages in wrapper.log like the following:
INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/02/02 10:36:04 | 2007-02-02 10:36:04,122
[Thread-2]
DEBUG ScmManager -
cvsRoot: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:24012401/path/to/module
If I remove the port number from the configuration, I run into the
first issue
where the changes aren't persisted to further builds.
Thanks for any pointers,
Eric
--
Eric Rose | "Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Juvenal (Satires, VI.347-8)
***********************************************************************
This message contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message
in error please notify the sender immediately. Any views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender specifically states them to be the views of another (including
a Body Corporate).
If you wish to opt out from future messages, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject UNSUBSCRIBE
************************************************************************
[attachment "att0cowi.dat" deleted by Joakim
Zetterberg/H00JZG/HK_ITLOG/BORÅS/ICA/SE]
