On 3/2/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before reading that what did you think something like: <version>1.0</version> meant? I'm actually interested in what general user opinion is here.
I suppose I've never reconciled how I thought it ought to work, with the actual behavior of "nearest" in the directed graph (which I like) coupled with the unpredictable things that would happen with dependencyManagement + transitivity. (Fixed in 2.0.5?) But how does this change things? If I declare a dependency on 1.0 and something two levels out declares [2.0], what do I get in my webapp? Does [...] syntax allow transitive dependencies to override my choices? If everyone switches to [...] then are we back where we started with "nearest" ? -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
