One of the biggest reasons we passed on Continuum was the lack of distributed building (in the sense that on machine controls what gets built on other machines in a cluster, NOT on build is spread across multiple machines). We have anywhere between 5 and 10 active branches at any given time and four build machines. This lets the build cluster to build 4 branches of those at a time.
If you're on the fence, I'd take 2.6 or wait for 2.6.2 of cruisecontrol and give that a shot. -----Original Message----- From: Phill Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:04 PM To: 'Maven Users List' Subject: RE: How is CruiseControl compare to Continuum? Have you considered Luntbuild? -----Original Message----- From: shinsato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 26, 2007 9:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: How is CruiseControl compare to Continuum? CruiseControl works pretty well with Maven2, we picked it instead of Continuum last year because there were some reports that Continuum might be immature still. There are lots of opinions on the internet about Continuum and CruiseControl, it would be interesting to hear what the Maven2 users here think about Continuum. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-is-CruiseControl-compare-to-Continuum--tf34683 44s177.h tml#a9684871 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
