I think Sun would not really like this :) You can cause very serious security violations in this manner. Can you not subclass File (com.my.File) and use that everywhere instead? It can extend File so you
have the same sort of behaviour...

Andy

On 23 May 2007, at 14:53, redhatvswin wrote:


Hm..Thanks

The reason is CDC..There are some classes does not exist, so I have to
implement them, however, to make sure I can run my applications on PC as
well, I need same naming...extra method is for legacy reasons.



Thorsten Heit-3 wrote:

Hi,

I have following problem and I am kind of stuck.
I have project that depends on project where I override some java
standard
classes and sometimes I have extra methods in there.
When i use eclipse, I can change order of classpath to have my Maven2 Dependencies over the JRE. However, when I try to install or compile, I
can
not because java complains that method not found in class java.io.File,
for
example. Is there a way to change this in maven to make sure compiler
first
looks classes in my dependencies and then in java libraries.

AFAIK no.

Just for curiosity:
What's your use case that you override Java standard classes? You know
that this can cause more or less serious problems trying to run your
application on another machine because your classes perhaps will not be
used/found...?

Why don't you just create subclasses of them?


Regards

Thorsten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with- classpath-order-tf3803436s177.html#a10764313
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to