I don't know if it would be a best practice, but I've been creating projects
that contains 3 poms...

/pom.xml
/war/pom.xml
/ear/pom.xml

First pom only references the other two poms as modules.
The entire project can be built from the first pom.


On 6/27/07, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I have dozens of web services that are being created as WAR's. For
consistency, each WAR that is deployed on seperate machines will be
packaged
as an EAR. Thus, each war also needed to be packaged into an EAR.

Is there a better more "Best-Practices" way of doing this?




On 6/27/07, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why?? While you might be able to configure this with some complex pom
> file, I don't see the point when it is far easier (and actually
> supported) to do this in 2 pom.xml files.
>
> Wayne
>
> On 6/27/07, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to create a war and an ear in one module (pom.xml)
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > Thanks,
> > Mick Knutson
> >
> > http://www.baselogic.com
> > http://www.blincmagazine.com
> > http://www.djmick.com
> > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> > http://www.myspace.com/djmick_dot_com
> > http://www.myspace.com/sexybeotches
> > http://www.thumpradio.com
> > ---
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
---
Thanks,
Mick Knutson

http://www.baselogic.com
http://www.blincmagazine.com
http://www.djmick.com
http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
http://www.myspace.com/djmick_dot_com
http://www.myspace.com/sexybeotches
http://www.thumpradio.com
---

Reply via email to