Good idea,
I'll change it immediately.
Regards,
Erik.
Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Erik van Oosten wrote on Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago I asked how to globally suppress inclusion of a
>> dependency. This was necessary to exclude commons-logging from my
>> application. The question was unanswered. I still did not find a
>> solution so I wrote my own version of a commons-logging release to
>> fool Maven and get rid of JCL.
>>
>> You can read about the why and how on my blog:
>> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/07/no-more-commons-l
>> ogging.html
>
> in any case it would be better to use a version like "99.0-does-not-exist"
> to mark it explicitly. I bet people will not like having to answering
> questions about JCL 9.0 on the JC-lists. It does not help, if you make a
> note in your blog and an artifact referencing this dep is later published
> to Maven central.
>
> - Jörg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--Complete-JCL-to-Slf4j-migration-tf4109124s177.html#a11685434
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
