Thanks Wayne. The problem seems to be resolved. Regards, Amit
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think your problem is as follows: > > Maven regards 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT as "before" 1.0.0. > Also Maven does not necessarily use the version you've declared. The > version tag is really more of a hint or suggestion than an absolute > requirement. (Unless you've "locked down" your versions.) > Thus, although you have a declared dependency on 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT, Maven > sees the 1.0.0 release version and uses it instead. > > I would suggest simply bumping the version to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. > Or perhaps using <version>[1.0.0-SNAPSHOT]</version> in your > dependency declaration. That will force Maven to use the snapshot and > not the release. > > In the future, do not number things like this. Snapshot always comes > before a release, and then you bump the version and make another > Snapshot. > > Wayne > > On 2/15/08, amit kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks simon I will take care for the selection of threads in > > future.Apologies for the same. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Mark Struberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > The only reason i can think of to have a snapshot repo in a company is > to > > > get rid of very old > > > snapshots which may bump up your repo size heavily. It is much easier > to > > > drop obsolete snapshots > > > if they are strictly separated from released modules. > > > > > > LieGrü, > > > strub > > > > > > --- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > > Hi Amit, > > > > > > > > Firstly, when you have a question that is not really related to an > > > > existing thread, then please start a new email thread rather than > > > > replying to the existing one. By doing that, and choosing a good > subject > > > > line for the email, other people with the same problem can later > search > > > > the email archives and find the necessary answer. > > > > > > > > AFAIK, there's no major problem having release and snapshot versions > in > > > > the same repository. > > > > > > > > This doesn't happen often with open-source projects because (a) all > > > > releases get put into the official repositories (ibiblio, > > > > rep1.maven.org) that are mirrored arround the world, and (b) > mirroring > > > > snapshots is silly. So for apache software for example, there is a > > > > non-mirrored repo that only holds snapshots, with all actual > releases > > > > going to the mirrored repos. > > > > > > > > But for a company that doesn't mirror its releases, I'm not aware of > any > > > > reason why snapshots and releases cannot be on the same repo. > > > > > > > > Your problem is probably that you have the <repository> tag that > points > > > > to your repo configured with snapshot-lookup disabled. Try adding > this > > > > to the repository tag: > > > > <snapshots> > > > > <enabled>true</enabled> > > > > </snapshots> > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > amit kumar schrieb: > > > > > SNAPSHOT Vs release version. > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > In our intranet maven repository we have both release version and > > > snaphot > > > > > version under the same groupId (under the same folder on file > system). > > > While > > > > > amounting to ignorance to SNAPSHOT versions, release version > existed > > > long > > > > > before SNAPSHOT versions started getting placed in the same > folder. > > > > > Now we realized that when people changed their dependency versions > to > > > > > snapshot, maven is not able to fetch the SNAPSHOT version, and it > just > > > tells > > > > > not able to find the specified jar. > > > > > > > > > > The earlier dependency of y on x > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.group.x</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>x</artifactId> > > > > > <version>1.0.0</version> > > > > > > > > > > has become > > > > > <groupId>com.group.x</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>x</artifactId> > > > > > <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > > > > > > > > > > and x has already been deployed to the repository with > > > > > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOTversion. Could someone please help me figure out > what > > > > > exactly is happening > > > > > here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails auf dem Handy. > > > www.yahoo.de/go > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
