i'm wondering if the solution would render the war-path plugin obsolete? it's causing trouble in embedded use. http://issues.appfuse.org/browse/APF-645
Milos On 6/3/08, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to share with you a workaround I found for the problem of > transitive dependencies in skinny wars. > In the documentation it is said that : > "Now the painful part. Your EAR's <<<pom.xml>>> needs to list every > dependency that the WAR has. > This is because Maven assumes fat WARs and does not include transitive > dependencies > of WARs within the EAR." > > A workaround of this is to define for each war 2 dependencies. One for the > war itself and another for the war's pom to retrieve transitive > dependencies. > With that you'll have something like that in your ear dependencies : > > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.acme</groupId> > <artifactId>war1</artifactId> > <version>1.0.0</version> > <type>war</type> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.acme</groupId> > <artifactId>war1</artifactId> > <version>1.0.0</version> > <type>pom</type> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > > I'm using maven 2.0.9. > > I'll do more tests tomorrow and I'll update the doc : > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/skinny-wars.html > > Cheers > > > arnaud > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
