What does mvn help:effective-pom say about the scope of those artifacts? Wayne
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have these 3 dependencies that are still ending up in my war: > > *<dependency> > <groupId>org.aspectj</groupId> > <artifactId>aspectjtools</artifactId> > <version>1.6.0</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.aspectj</groupId> > <artifactId>aspectjweaver</artifactId> > <version>1.5.4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.aspectj</groupId> > <artifactId>aspectjweaver</artifactId> > <version>1.6.0</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency>* > > Why am I not allowed to scope these top provided so they are not in my war? > My war is >45MB and need to slim it down. > > > -- > --- > Thank You… > > Mick Knutson > BASE Logic, inc. > > Website: http://baselogic.com > Blog: http://baselogic.com/blog > BLiNC Magazine: http://blincmagazine.com > Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson > DJ Mick: http://djmick.com > MySpace: http://myspace.com/mickknutson > Tahoe: http://tahoe.baselogic.com >
