if there is a duplicate manifest.mf on javaee.jar from their distro
did you contact sun on this issue and what was the response?

Martin 
______________________________________________ 
Disclaimer and confidentiality note 
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business 
of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not 
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does 
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. 


> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:50:04 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: javaee.jar issues
> 
> I'm having an issue with some things I got from Sun and I believe it might
> have been encountered by people here.
> I downloaded the Linux JavaEE SDK from [1] .  I did this in order to have
> javaee.jar available as an internal dependency.
> Upon examination of this jar, I noticed a second MANIFEST.MF in the root of
> the jar (!) that references jxr and jax rpc elements.
> 
> This issue concerns me in a couple of ways.  First, it makes me think that
> Java's release process isn't so hot.  Then I start to wonder if my belief
> that javaee.jar has no dependencies is accurate.  When I went looking for a
> place to ask about this, I discovered that there doesn't appear to be a good
> one.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this or do I have some sort of three-headed alien baby
> version of javaee.jar?
> Is there a place to report this that I didn't find?
> I noted that another version, apparently from the windows install, doesn't
> seem to have this (based on information from a colleague).  Can someone
> verify that for me?
> 
> Thanks for any insights,
> Mykel
> 
> 
> [1] http://java.sun.com/javaee/downloads/index.jsp  ->
> java_ee_sdk-5_05-linux-nojdk-ml.bin

_________________________________________________________________
Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008

Reply via email to