On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:47:13 Ian Robertson wrote: > I'm actually curious if anyone knows the reason for this; it seams that > a far better choice would be to choose the *lowest* version which > matches all range requirements, so that builds could be temporally > stable.
ranges would be useless because they would never change, ultimately it assumes that you are converging on the goal and new releases are better... which is quite reasonable -- Michael McCallum Enterprise Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
