Hi, from mbuni point of view, there is no difference whether client comes from WAP 2.0 enabled phone or 1.x. However, for WAP 2.0 you often will have to use some HTTP proxy to replace Kannel.
Also keep in mind, that some phones supporting WAP 2.0 may still send MMS using WAP 1.x stack (it's often configurable), hence they will use Kannel as WAP 1.x gateway. In these cases Kannel still has some unresolved problems related with WTP SAR. On 3/5/06, Real World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi , > > As i know kannel WAP Gateway doesn't support for WAP 2.0 , and kannel WAP > Gateway is a part of MBUNI MMS gateway . Does that uncompatibility of kannel > will be a problem to serve MMS for WAP 2.0 enabled handsets ? > > Do you solved that WAP 2.0 issue for kannel wap Gateway ? > > Thanx in advance, > Mark. > > > > ________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users_mbuni.org > > > -- Dziugas _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users_mbuni.org
