Are you using latest CVS? Appears to be fixed (except if the DLR is reporting an error involving a failed lookup -- i.e. an error generated by the system). Perhaps log files would help narrow this down.
On 9/25/07, Deon van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > On 9/25/07, Paul Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reports and notifications are generated by the system, hence the sender. > In > > practice I guess it can make a difference to some devices which use the > > 'from' address to match the DLR against the original message. (They > should > > more properly use the message-id). > > > > I agree that the message-id should be enough. One operator's MM4 > interface uses it as a kind of double-check validation. > > > Is it a problem? Can be changed easily I believe. > > > > I have been scratching around, but have been unable to find the exact > place... perhaps it was just to late at night. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
