AFAIK, WAP 2.0 is essentially HTTP with a proxy, so it is even easier to handle on the WAP side. Regarding the commercial stuff, please direct questions to the email below.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Real World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok thank you again. > In kannel wap gateway , they do not have added that WAP 2.0 capability > option. Its handed over to developers. Like wise in MBUNI don't we have to > do any customizations ? directly can we use MBUNI from it source ? If so why > do you have commercial source and the support ? > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Real World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: MBUNI - MMS <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 5:10:59 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Freedom of MBUNI > > We are aware of a number of operators using Mbuni in this way, it all > depends how much traffic you will be handling. You would also do well to use > the PostgreSQL queue driver instead of the file-based one, as this makes > queue management faster and easier/cleaner. > You can also of course speak to the Trained Professionals at Skycore ( > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) if some hand-holding is desired. > > > P. > > On Aug 06, 2008, at 12:53, Real World wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. Just a small question . > Say we going to put mbuni for in front of high load like what mobile > operator receiving. Does mbuni handles that load very well ? or is there any > modification we have to do for mbuni source codes ?? > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Real World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: MBUNI - MMS <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 2:56:17 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Freedom of MBUNI > > Mbuni does not depend on Kannel as the WAP Gateway, so yes you can do as > you suggest below. > Paul. > > On Aug 06, 2008, at 12:01, Real World wrote: > > Hi , > > Is MBUNI directly depend on kannel WAP gateway ? Just for Fetch MSISDN for > all mms request do we have to have kannel wap gateway infront of MBUNI ? > > For insrtance if we have different wap gateway from a different vendor , > can't we use MBUNI as a MMS gateway since those WAP gateways are parsing > MSISDN same as what kannel wap gateway does? > > > Many Thanks > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
