I'm using 2.0-M1 as well.
No issues so far.
-str
On May 14, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Mark Webb wrote:
I would look at it this way....
Use 2.0 for your development. The more people that use it, the more
bugs/issues are found and can be resolved. I have been developing a
program that has been using 2.0 for 6 months and have had very little
issue with it.
..just my $.02
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Abhijit Bhatode wrote:
Hi,
We need to use Apache MINA 2.0 for server development. Apache MINA
site
recommends using 1.1 version as it is the most stable release.
Can you please let us know the possible release timeline/roadmap
for the
next release for MINA 2.0?
Nope... If "by the end of this year or may be somewhere around
2009" is
enough, consider it as a correct estimation.
This is OSS. We don't sell products, we build the best possible
software,
and it all depends on volunteers, whose time and dedication is
limited.
If you really "need" to use MINA 2.0, then just do it, and if you
find
some bugs or issues, feel free to submit some patches, and may be
become
part of the project. This is the only way you can get some kind of
guarantee
that the project will fit your needs.
In the meantime, just use 1.1. But we aware that 1.1 is just as
stable as
any other version, and that 2.0-M1 might be as stable as 1.1. The
thing is
that 2.0-M1 API might be changed in one of its future release.
Hope it helps.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
