Ah, makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Squee wrote: >> >> Why is IoBuffer being removed? The dynamic resizing is very handy. >> What's the plan to replace that functionality? >> > > The idea (still in discussion) is to offer an InputStream instead of a > flavor of ByteBuffer. This will be helpfull as all the filter will > manipulate this InputStream, being a ByteBufferInputStream (where all the > incoming ByteBuffers will be added), a LineInputStream (if you use a > CumulativeFilter) or a MessageInputStream (when the bytes have been > decoded). > > But basically, from the user point of view, that won't change anything. > > FYI, this is something which has been discussed extensively this spring. > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
