Sorry about beeing too little specific. I am running Windows Vista Business version [Version 6.0.6001] (latest patches) Java 1.6.0_update10 32bit (latest) MINA 1.1.7
This is a client application that is not supposed to listen to any ports, but it is supposed to connect to our server (148.122.55.35:15000). Example output from "netstat -on": Run #1: TCP 193.212.217.184:59569 148.122.55.35:15000 ESTABLISHED 51264 TCP 127.0.0.1:59570 127.0.0.1:59571 ESTABLISHED 51264 TCP 127.0.0.1:59571 127.0.0.1:59570 ESTABLISHED 51264 TCP 127.0.0.1:59572 127.0.0.1:59573 ESTABLISHED 51264 TCP 127.0.0.1:59573 127.0.0.1:59572 ESTABLISHED 51264 Run #2: TCP 127.0.0.1:59816 127.0.0.1:59817 ESTABLISHED 42788 TCP 127.0.0.1:59817 127.0.0.1:59816 ESTABLISHED 42788 TCP 127.0.0.1:59818 127.0.0.1:59819 ESTABLISHED 42788 TCP 127.0.0.1:59819 127.0.0.1:59818 ESTABLISHED 42788 TCP 193.212.217.184:59815 148.122.55.35:15000 ESTABLISHED 42788 As you can see, the client correctly connects to the server, but seems to make 4 "loopback connections" on random ports each run. These listening ports causes Windows Vista to warn. When using MINA 1.1.5, no such "loopback" connections are observed. Regards Gunnar Bjorgum 2008/11/17 Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Gunnar Bjørgum wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I am working on a project where we use MINA for client-server >> communication. >> We use the latest stable release 1.1.7, but we get a windows warning, that >> the client sets up listening ports. When using 1.1.5, this does not >> happen. >> > > Which version of Java ? Which version of Widnows? Which port are you > listening to ? >> >> Maybe not a big issue, but our customers get a bit worried when this >> warning pops up. >> > > Well, Vista is known for showing a hell lot of warnings, all over the place. > That's the way it's supposed to 'protect' the users against malevolent > actions. However, IFAIK, those warnings can be shut down. >> >> I see that the issue is registered in JIRA >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-628 ), >> but I see no comments. >> > > Because nobody has already experienced such an issue, or because we don't > have enough information about the problem. Saying 'I have warnings with > 1.1.7 when I was clear on 1.1.5 is not enough, as we have no idea what can > have changed, if we except the MINA version). > > When you have such a problem, the best is to give as much information as > possible. > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
