On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Rick Houlihan<[email protected]> wrote: > We found that MINA has a terrible time handling high volume requests. > Performance bogged down as we ramped up connections and we saw multiple > request timeouts no matter how we configured the NioSocketAcceptor. > > Near complete lack of documentation and zero response to our postings on > this list seeking a resolution led us to switch over to Netty, which has > been working beautifully for our application. >
Rick, as someone that is just embarking upon building a proprietary protocol in mina 2.x for a project at work this is interesting feedback. Our stack to date is built on mina 1.x branch - but it doesn't push much in the way of traffic. Was your experience with the 1.x branch? This new 2.x branch project is set to be responsible for a lot more traffic. > RH > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Recommend reading the Proxy example code. That may be of help. >> >> Refer these classes >> org.apache.mina.example.proxy.AbstractProxyIoHandler >> org.apache.mina.example.proxy.ClientToProxyIoHandler >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Kumar Phani<[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > How to write and where to configure a WorkerThread which will be created >> per >> > session basis,then it will able to create new thread for every request. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> thanks >> ashish >> >> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog >> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >> > -- god loves atheists, Fact: http://www.mrwiggleslovesyou.com/comics/rehab477.jpg
