In the previous email I meant 3ms and not 5ms. Sorry for the typo.
Bruno On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno de Carvalho<[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, > > > Thanks for your attention and time. > It is in fact reasonable but if you increase the sleep time - say, > like 4ms - you will notice that the individual lifetime average goes > lower than that those 5ms. > What I'm trying to understand is why that individual lifetime is > greater than the global average. It may even be normal, I'm just > trying to get a proper and convincing explanation - these results will > go in a thesis, so you see why I need that explanation ;) > > Still, those are pretty good results, I can't get any better than an > average of 40ms with a core 2 duo lappy @ 2Ghz, both windows and > linux. > > > Best regards, > Bruno > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Christopher > Popp<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >>>> Speaking in numbers, executing the test multiple times, I get a constant >>>> global average of ~1ms lifetime, but individual lifetime measurement >>>> averages ranges 40~80ms. >> >> >> >> I downloaded your code and gave it a run...it printed out the following with >> the defaults (no sleep). >> >> [SERVER] Binding Server to localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 TCP >> [SERVER] Bound to localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 >> [SERVER] Session created: /127.0.0.1:2598 >> [CLIENT] Session created: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 >> [CLIENT] Session opened: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 >> [CLIENT] Connected to server, sending message. >> [SERVER] Session opened: /127.0.0.1:2598 >> [SERVER] Test completed, took 63ms to receive 100 packets (63ms after >> sleep discounts). >> [SERVER] Calculated average lifetime was 00.63ms. >> [SERVER] Individual average lifetime was 3.03ms. >> [CLIENT] Session closed: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 >> [SERVER] Session closed: /127.0.0.1:2598 >> [SERVER] Received a total of 5300b >> >> Maybe I am missing something, but it seems pretty reasonable to me. I ran >> it under Windows XP on a laptop with a dual core processor. >> >> Chris >> >> >> >
