Le Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:01:50 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> a écrit :
> [email protected] wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > I'm looking into refurbishing a homebrew communication server. > > In practice it's: > > *supporting several transports, TCP, SNA, MQ, whatever > > *protocol converter on top of that, e.g. for example send in > > propitary format A over transport T1, convert it to format B and > > send it over transport T2. The protocols are entirely propietary > > > > I'm looking into MINA to provide the backbones/framework of a > > refactoring/rewrite/cleanup/whatever, and it looks promising, > > however, mina looks quite Scoket (tcp/udp) centric - at least for > > 1.x? > > > > have anybody used mina for other transports, and how suitable is it > > for that? > Well, as you said, it's pretty much TCP/UDP oriented (if you except > the serial part). That does not mean you can't plug your own > transport, but that would be a consequent effort, IMO. > > What about SNA over TCP, etc ? > > Julien, as you wrote the serial part, can you tell more about how > complex is it to plug a transport under MINA ? > Implementing a new tansport is not really complex, if it's polling based it's even easier because you can extend all the abstract Polling* classes. Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
