On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Zvika Gart <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Keep in mind that the way you used MINA is really very specific. I > > don't have such performance simply because I never transfer such big > > messages. If you consider that messages that will be exchanged never > > exceed a few kilobytes, then performances are also excellent. > > > The way I used MINA is the most basic. It should be performant. The uploaded > data can be FTP data, HTTP Form data, etc. The current MINA code is capping > the upload bandwidth.
Niklas ? How do you handle such a case on FtpServer ? > You don't need to configure anything. The OS itself grows/shrinks the > receive buffer & window size as needed. We saw that in the simple > implementations. I didn't configure the receive buffer and it (and the > receive window) grew to 2MB. Ok, we have to check the code to see what's going on (ie, if there is no reason to configure anything, and if we block at 64k, then that mean we have a default config somewhere) -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
