Hi, I checked out latest SVN trunk of MINA. Clean&Build was no problem. I then switches my dependency to MINA 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT and run the junit test again. Result: Nothing changed. Issue still visible.
Then I had a deeper look into SVN. In branch folder for 2.0.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/mina/branches/2.0.1/mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/codec/ProtocolCodecFilter.java?view=markup&pathrev=1023759) I found the change (line 331-333). So I updated my local mina trunk with this change and tried my junit test again. Result: Works fine. Exception is gone. So 2.0.1 branch seems to work, but trunk is missing this fix. br, Alex On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:03:40 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/18/10 11:59 AM, Alexander Christian wrote: >> Hi guys, > > Hi, > > I have tested your code with MINA 2.0.0-M6 and 2.0.0, and I get numerous > exceptions. Then I switched to trunk, which has just been fixed for this > bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-803, and it seems to > work (here are the traces I get) : > > Creating registry > SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings. > SLF4J: Found binding in > [jar:file:/Users/elecharny/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-jdk14/1.5.8/slf4j-jdk14-1.5.8.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] > SLF4J: Found binding in > [jar:file:/Users/elecharny/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.5.11/slf4j-log4j12-1.5.11.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] > SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an > explanation. > Starting threads > Closing registry > duration=741 > > Can you confirm that using the trunk, your code is working ? > > If so, it's very likely that we launch a vote for a 2.0.1 very quickly. > > Thanks !
