Lecharny: I wrote my own encode and decode method that implements MessageEncoder and MessageDecoder. I don't think it's a prblem in codec because it could work OK when I set small sendBufferSize, I ever sent more than 3 million messages. If I set sendBufferSize to 1024, it could run nearly one half hour, and then become slow. If I set sendBufferSize to 4096, may become slow in 5 minutes. All these happened when I continue to send messages. I mean I'v tested the encode and decode methods. I found it's slow at the line: wf.awaitUninterruptibly(); It's still work, but become very slow
2010-11-29 bjrenyong 发件人： Emmanuel Lecharny 发送时间： 2010-11-29 00:04:31 收件人： users 抄送： 主题： Re: set sendBufferSize to 1024 or larger will cause write block On 11/28/10 4:41 PM, bjrenyong wrote: > Lecharny: > Thanks for your reply. I'm using the DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory because I > have multiple types of messages to send. Could you give me more prompting? What protocol are you decoding ? Is it your own one ? Do you have any idea where the server is blocked ? Have you added some log in the filter chain (LogFilter) to know what happens? If your client never gets an answer, basically it's either because your server does not sent one, or because your client does not have the full response decoded. You have to determinate what is the cause. Some Wireshark session could help. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
