Yes, I'd prefer to just use Factory<...> too. I had just been looking at
FileSystemFactory while I was thinking and didn't notice that it's create
method needed a String.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, I think so.
> In all cases, I'd like NioSocketAcceptorFactory to implement
> Factory<IoAcceptor> to be consistent.
> I'm not really sure if there's a need to an explicit interface, as
> Factory looks sufficient for me, but why not.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 14:59, Bill Kuker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to add an NioSocketAcceptorFactory interface, and
> then
> > add several methods to ServerFactoryManager:
> >
> > getTcpipForwardNioSocketAcceptorFactory()
> > getX11ForwardNioSocketAcceptorFactory()
> > getSshServerNioSocketAcceptorFactory() [maybe]
> >
> > The last one could replace SshServer's createAcceptor() and
> > configure(IoAcceptor) methods.
> > Incidentally we are also patching TcpipForwardSupport to do the same
> > ReceiveBufferSize configuration that the SshServer does, but this could
> be
> > done in one default implementation of NioSocketAcceptorFactory.
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> You're absolutely right.
> >> The SshServer has a method that can be overriden, but not the
> >> TcpipForwardSupport nor the X11ForwardSupport.
> >> Using a factory for creating all NioSocketAcceptor would definitely be
> >> a good idea.   There's already a Factory<T> class that can be used for
> >> that, so adding
> >>   Factory<IoAcceptor> getIoAcceptorFactory();
> >> to the ServerFactoryManager (and maybe  a getIoConnectorFactory() on
> >> the ClientFactoryManager) is the way to go.
> >> Wanna raise a JIRA and eventually provide a patch?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 15:45, Bill Kuker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > I had looked into that, but I could not figure out where to add it.
> The
> >> > entire process of accepting the connection and doing the necessary SSH
> >> > things to get the port forward working is handled entirely by Mina /
> >> SSHD;
> >> > there is no place for my application code to get into that process and
> >> mess
> >> > with the IoSession or SocketAcceptor.
> >> >
> >> > I had thought down the filter road before, and I believe I would need
> >> > something like an NioSocketAcceptorFactory (a new interface) that the
> >> > TcpipForwardSupport uses in initialize(), giving me a chance to wire
> in
> >> > whatever additional Filters I want?
> >> >
> >> > -Bill
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ashish <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> IMHO, using BlacklistFilter would be a better option
> >> >>
> >> >> Check out org.apache.mina.filter.firewall.BlacklistFilter
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks
> >> >> ashish
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Bill Kuker <[email protected]
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hello.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I am currently using the ForwardingFilter's canListen() &
> canConnect()
> >> >> > functions in my application to control which port forwards SSH
> clients
> >> >> are
> >> >> > allowed to create. I would like to also be able to filter incoming
> >> >> > connections to listening port forwards. For the moment I added a
> >> method
> >> >> to
> >> >> > the ForwardingFilter interface:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    boolean isAllowed(InetSocketAddress sourceAddress,
> >> InetSocketAddress
> >> >> > destinationAddress, ServerSession session);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And check with it from TcpipForwardSupport's sessionCreated()
> >> function.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think this is a useful capability for applications with embedded
> SSH
> >> >> > servers, and would like to submit a patch, rather than re-applying
> it
> >> to
> >> >> > each release, but I wanted to ask if there would be a better, more
> >> likely
> >> >> to
> >> >> > be accepted, design for it, and also ask if I have just missed a
> less
> >> >> > obvious way to accomplish this with the existing code.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Bill
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> thanks
> >> >> ashish
> >> >>
> >> >> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> >> >> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >> ------------------------
> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >> ------------------------
> >> Open Source SOA
> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>
> >> Connect at CamelOne May 24-26
> >> The Open Source Integration Conference
> >> http://camelone.com/
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
> Connect at CamelOne May 24-26
> The Open Source Integration Conference
> http://camelone.com/
>

Reply via email to