If, for any reason, you couldn't port your APP to Mina 2 (that's the safest choice), you can always use different classloaders for the applications (similar to the OSGI suggestion).
2011/9/6 Chris Gamache <cgama...@gmail.com> > Understood. Unfortunately, it's not my application using Mina 1. There's a > nice guide at http://mina.apache.org/changes-between-2x-and-1x.html. I'll > see how far I can get porting someone else's application. Any other tips > would be most welcome! > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > On 9/6/11 10:56 PM, Chris Gamache wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the response. The services built on Mina specifically lack > that > >> kind of heavy framework. My exposure to OSGi is limited. Could you > explain > >> in more detail how OSGi would help here? > >> > > It was more or less ironic. > > > > Sadly, there is no simple way to make MINA 1 and 2 loaded on the same > JVM, > > unless you make the whole project a bundle. That mean you will have to > > integrate an OSGi container in your application. OSGi offers the big > > advantage to have a specific class loader which insolate each bundle from > > the others, allowing you to use two bundles depending on two different > sets > > of jars. > > > > Not that it's a complex task, but frankly, you'd better migrate your MINA > 1 > > application to use MINA 2. > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com > > > > >
