There's no locking mechanism  for files  in  Apache FTPServer.


2012/3/16 Sharmistha Chatterjee <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> One more doubt. IS there any locking mechanism present in the FTP stack of
> apache/ Apache API  by which read and write operations can be locked.
>
> Or we need to use some other protocol for file transfer using locking
> mechanism.
>
> Regards,
> Sharmistha
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Sharmistha Chatterjee <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank  you..
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, gaurav chopra <
> [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> In this particular situation ,u need to provide locking explicitly in
> the
> >> code.
> >> On Mar 16, 2012 11:21 AM, "Sharmistha Chatterjee" <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the reply. I am going to update the same file frequently at
> >> the
> >> > apache web server. And client at the other end can request the file
> >> > anytime, So if the updation of the old file is going on, will it be
> >> > possible for the requested client to get the older copy of the file,
> >> till
> >> > updation is complete.
> >> >
> >> > Is it taken care of Apache Web server or I have to provide locking
> >> > explicitly.
> >> >
> >> > Reagrds,
> >> > sharmsitha
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:12 AM, gaurav chopra
> >> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > u need to provide the implementation for the same in the
> code...where
> >> you
> >> > > are using the files for further processing.
> >> > > On Mar 16, 2012 10:10 AM, "Sharmistha Chatterjee" <
> >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am new to Apache FTP server. I have one doubt regarding
> concurrent
> >> > read
> >> > > > and write. Does the Apache server allows/makes a copy of the older
> >> > > version
> >> > > > of the file while it is getting updated. So
> >> > > > when any read request comes at the time of updating the file, the
> >> older
> >> > > > version is read from the other side.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > > sharmistha
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > sharmistha
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > sharmistha
> >
>
>
>
> --
> sharmistha
>

Reply via email to