2014-03-05 18:53 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>:

> Le 3/5/14 6:44 PM, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to ask regarding the release sequence.
> >
> > At site I see latest is 0.9.0[1].
>
> This is the latest release.
> >
> > At maven central I see 0.10.0[2].
> this is a tag not a release.
> >
> > It mirrors I see 0.10.0[3].
> Same.
> >
> > At git I can see 0.10.1[4] tagged.
> Same.
> >
> > Quite confusing :)
>
> Nope. We do release sources, not binaries. Official binaries are those
> available on the MINA web site, and anything else are just working
> artefacts.
>
> We do not endorse any release which ha snot be voted and signed.
> >
> > Can the site[1] be modified with latest?
> It's already up to date.
>

Not really actually.  The 0.10.0 has been released 2 weeks ago.
I was going to update it when I just found that 0.10.0 was not working for
me so I started the  0.10.1 release.
I thought about skipping that one and only update for 0.10.1 ...


>
> > and can 0.10.1 be available
> > if was released?
>
> A vote is going on, and if the vote has not been closed, it's probably
> because some issues have been found in SSHD.
>

In the case of 0.10.1, we're missing a few votes.  I suppose it won't be
long before it is released now.
There are a few bugs with workarounds, so I'm planning a 0.10.2 release to
fix those in the coming weeks.


>
>
> Side note, for devs :
> Here, I think we should agree that when the vote is not closed, then we
> should cancel teh vote after the 72 delays. Also we should probably not
> use a new revision number for each attempt : this is typically teh kind
> of confusion we get if we do what sebb was proposing, and this is the
> reason we delete the tags if the vote is cancelled.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>

Reply via email to