Le 13/07/2018 à 03:30, Pablo Caballero a écrit : > Hi Jonathan. Thanks a lot! I'll consider your suggestion.
Hi Pablo, we are currently discussing about a change in the version naming scheme. MINA 3 was started 5 years ago, and the latest release (3.0.0-M2) was done 4 years ago, and it was a milestone. To be clear, it was an experiment that never went to its end. In the mean time, 12 releases of MINA 2 has been done (from 2.0.8 to the current and recent 2.0.19 - 5 weeks ago -). That is 4 releases a year, on average. Now, 2.0 is a maintenance branch. That means we are committed to fix any bugs that is discovered (and I must tell that it's quite incredible that after all those years, we still find bugs in the code base! Well, oh well, we have great users that reports them, and they are better than we, the developpers ;-) That being said, if you are using MINA 2.0.x, migration should not be an issue (except that in 2.0.8 we introduced a minor change in the API [1]) If you are using MINA 1.x, please feel free to ask any question you may have... Thaks ! [1] http://mina.apache.org/mina-project/index.html#mina-208-released-posted-on-september-22-2014 -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
