-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Monday 04 August 2003 03:46, Kuba Leszewski wrote:

> I searched through the archive and found that I can simply type
> interfaces="ipsec0=eth0 ipsec1=eth0:1", to use freeswan with ip aliases.
> So i did it, but it didn't work.
>
> I got:
> Aug  1 05:23:08 krypton ipsec_setup: KLIPS ipsec0 on eth0:1
> a.b.c.d/255.255.255.248 broadcast a.b.c.e

That doesn't jive with your "interfaces" line above, but I don't see how that 
could cause this:

> Aug  1 05:23:08 krypton ipsec_setup: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/tncfg: Socket
> ioctl failed on attach -- No such device.  Is the physical device valid?

Have you tried issuing:

ipsec tncfg --attach --virtual ipsec0 --physical eth0:1

> I use super-freeswan-1.99_kb1 and kernel 2.2.21.

I've worked with FreeS/WAN and ip aliases before, with little trouble. This 
has always been with a 2.4.x kernel, but I see archived posts from users 
using ip aliases with 2.2.x.

Perhaps you should post a barf? More detail might help.

- -- 
Sam Sgro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPzHzcEOSC4btEQUtAQEthQQAzEpG1HAJhmcLokcwDX+FTr3Xh6mHzKBL
k1GI3FXi07JRxp+4pqmWaUjViJiBm5Hy2ygjWhS6cpxm0RMdwzwYOp+o8MXYyBXh
2p7puNM6x2HHcmdES3cEbkph5APN7xQAdznSe7GU/xBREg7uBalEihB4TZF7Jokw
Bpc0ryRG078=
=FVvl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
FreeS/WAN Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mj2.freeswan.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr

Reply via email to