Thanks for the quick response. The only reason I am using SuperFreeswan instead of the Stock Freeswan is the support for NAT Traversal on freeswan which requires changes to the Kernel Source. Do you know if the USAGI Patches include support for NAT Traversal ?
>SuSE has cleaned up and subsequently merged the USAGI patches to >get decent IPv6 support (to meet the CGL specification). The USAGI >patches include a kernel implementation to support IPsec (and IPsecv6). >Thus you don't need to compile KLIPS any more. >Olaf Kirch has done most of the hard work. > >Unfortunately the pfkey interface is poorly standardized and the >one from USAGI is quite different from what KLIPS does (which is >Different from what kernel 2.6 does). >I'm afraid, you won't be able to compile a standard FreeS/WAN or >SuperFreeS/WAN on a USAGI kernel. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kurt Garloff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fernando Valderrama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [Users] suse 2.4.19-340 and superfreeswan 1.99.5.1 _______________________________________________ FreeS/WAN Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mj2.freeswan.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
