That's fine. As long as behavior of the JSP editors, more or less resembles the old SCAN eitors. I'll ask Eduard for the details next week.
Thanks, RJ On 26-09-2002 16:49, "Michiel Meeuwissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roelof Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is it somehow possible to make the JSP editors work with Basic Security? >> Ideally they should work independent of the chosen security module, or is >> this a na?ve thougth? > > The jsp-editors _are_ independent of the chosen security implementation. > > But the old 'scan' security with authrel and so on is afaik not made > accessiable through the bridge, so the jsp-editors do not use it. > > But e.g. making builders invisible _is_ possible, with the 'bridge security' > implementations. > > See e.g. the jsp-editors on design.mmbase.org/testing/edit, where some types > are invisble and other ones are 'read-only' and one could even define > builders which e.g. are 'read/delete' (but not write) (of course this is > icaches). > > Michiel
