Hi Ernst, Just extract the zip file over the binary uml2mmbase1.3 installation... The path created will be: modules/uml2mmbase-core/templates
In the build.xml this path is added before the jars in:
<!-- Define our class path -->
<path id="base.classpath">
<pathelement path="modules/uml2mmbase-core"/>
<fileset dir="${lib.dir}">
<include name="*.jar"/>
</fileset>
</path>
This will make sure the patched templates will be loaded first..
Hope this helps,
Rudie.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ernst
> Bunders
> Verzonden: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:42 PM
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
>
>
>
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp
> > Verzonden: donderdag 11 november 2004 12:48
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> >
> >
> > Hi Ernst,
> >
> > I looked into your model and it is just fine (nice model
> > though!). I'm afraid you ran into a nasty bug. I sent a patch
> > for this bug as an attachment. I also uploaded the patch to
> > mmapps. The bug was in the code that sorted the
> > modelelements. This patch no longer sorts the builders, but
> > at least generates them.
> >
> > The patch actually shows you how you can easily adjust the
> > templates if you need to change them. In the
> > modules/uml2mmbase-core/templates directory you can put all
> > templates that you need to change (the can be extracted from
> > the uml2mmbase-core.jar file).
>
> thanks for the help, but i'm not quite there yet.
> first, i had to make a directorystructure like
> uml2mmbase1.7\src\andromda-mmbase\templates where i had to put
> mmbase-search.vsl to get rid of an error.
> but i don't think the app uses the new version of
> mmbase-application.vsl
> (the behavour is still the same). i did some playing around, but
> probalby don't get the path right. some things i tried:
> uml2mmbase1.7\src\andromda-mmbase\modules\uml2mmbase-core\temp
> lates\mmba
> se-application.vsl
> uml2mmbase1.7\src\modules\uml2mmbase-core\templates\mmbase-app
> lication.v
> sl
> uml2mmbase1.7\modules\uml2mmbase-core\templates\mmbase-applica
> tion.vsl
>
> can you tell me what i'm doing wrong?
>
> thanks,
>
> Ernst
>
>
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Rudie.
> >
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ernst
> > > Bunders
> > > Verzonden: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:27 AM
> > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp
> > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 12:55
> > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ernst,
> > > >
> > > > You can use as many diagrams as you like. It's only the model
> > > > that counts.
> > >
> > > That's what I thought.
> > >
> > > >But all model elements will be used, so if that
> > > > is not your intention, that might be the cause of the
> > > > problem...
> > >
> > > Well, the problem is that for all the builders in my
> model the app
> > > creates builderfiles and wizards. Allso in
> APPLICATION.xml both the
> > > neededreldeflist and allowedrelationlist are complete. Only the
> > > neededbuilderlist is missing about half the builders.
> There are no
> > > error messages either.
> > >
> > > > Are you using mmbase 1.6 or 1.7. The default is
> > > > 1.7 now, so that might be a problem?
> > >
> > > Nop. I'm using 1.7.
> > >
> > > So. Is there anything you can think about? Is it possible
> > that due to
> > > some error in the xmi file the creation of the
> neederbuilderlist is
> > > running into a problem? Or is it possible to get more
> > verbose logging
> > > from uml2mmbase? I must say I'm a bit anxious about this.. For
> > > completeness I include the zuml file.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ernst
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Rudie.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Ernst Bunders
> > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:45 PM
> > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp
> > > > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 12:09
> > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ernst,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just created a uml2mmbase category, so you can
> add the RFE
> > > > > > there. Actually, there is also a UML2MMbase forum. I
> > think that
> > > > > > would be the preferred way to discuss UML2MMbase
> > features. The
> > > > > > mmbase users mailing list is probably not the best place to
> > > > > > discuss this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rudie.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the other hand, you need to log in to post to the
> > forum and it
> > > > > is not exactly thriving.
> > > > > So I will risk obusing this list some more.
> > > > > It seems I have a problem. I have made a nice model with
> > > mmbase2uml.
> > > > > Now I am making some changes and try to convert it to an
> > > > > mmbase app. All
> > > > > goes well except not alle builders are listed in the
> > > > > neededbuilderlist.
> > > > > I do user a number of diagrams, assuming that that is ok.
> > > > Am I right?
> > > > > Are there other tips you could give me to trouble
> > shoot? Regards,
> > > > > Ernst
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Ernst Bunders
> > > > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:55 AM
> > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wouldn't it be nice to add some categories to the RFE
> > > > > > section for the
> > > > > > > project? Like for every app in the project. Otherwise it
> > > > > > might get a
> > > > > > > bit messy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ernst
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp
> > > > > > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 11:28
> > > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Ernst,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It is currently not possible in UML2MMBase to specify
> > > > a default
> > > > > > > > value. But in UML you can specify an initial value
> > > > which could
> > > > > > > > be used to model de default value. So if it is
> > > possible with
> > > > > > > > edit wizards, it can be possible with UML2MMBase.
> > > > Please add a
> > > > > > > > RFE at mmapps.sourceforge.net for this feature.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > FYI, I'm currently working on supporting the
> > > > MagicDraw UML tool
> > > > > > > > (which in my opinion is even better than Poseidon
> > UML), for
> > > > > > > > which also a community edition is available.. The
> > > > next release
> > > > > > > > of UML2MMBase will have this support.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > cheers,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rudie Ekkelenkamp.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > Michiel Meeuwissen
> > > > > > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:09 AM
> > > > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > Onderwerp: Re: Uml2mmbase: default field values
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Kees Jongenburger wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:47 +0100, Ernst Bunders
> > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to set default values for
> > > fields? I can't
> > > > > > > > > find it in the
> > > > > > > > > > > document
> > > > > > > > > > This is not possible in mmbase , unless you
> create you
> > > > > > > > own builders
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Indeed, but he referred to UML2MMBase in which indeed
> > > > > > it would be
> > > > > > > > > imagineable, because it also generates
> > > editwizards, IIRC. In
> > > > > > > > > Editwizard XML's you can specify defaults.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil'
> > > > > > > > > Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] ()
> > > > > > > > > +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
