> Thanks for the info.

I didn't see this framework before, only knew Struts-Workflow-Extension.
seams
to be the same.

> Did not have the time yet to study this solution in detail so I might 
> have missed something important. But rather than implementing 
> the same 
> thing in MyFaces I would prefer a solution simliar to the Tiles 
> intergration.
> WDYT?


sounds reasonable to me, to build an integration-bridge.
but Tiles is/was ASL but WFNM is LGPL.
So we are not able to *host* WFNM-Libs on *.apache.org-Servers
Perhaps WFNM changes to a liberal licence like ASL2.0

Btw. I am just downloading the samples and will look inside.

Regards,
Matthias

> Manfred
> 
> 
> niksa_os wrote:
> > I have problem with backwards navigation in my jsf app. So, 
> I search 
> > net
> > for solution and I find this article
> > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-webflow/?ca=dnt-546
> >  
> > "The WebFlow Navigation Manager framework (which I'll call WFNM for
> > short) is a Web framework that focuses on problems that current 
> > frameworks, such as Struts or JavaServer Faces (see the 
> Resources for 
> > links to both), do not manage. Rather than trying to 
> reinvent the wheel, 
> > it complements and can be used in conjunction with these other 
> > frameworks, and can even be used with applications based on 
> servlets and 
> > JSP pages alone. WFNM is distributed under the Lesser GNU Public 
> > License, and binaries containing WFNM code can thus be used in any 
> > commercial Web application."
> >  
> > Maybe myFaces team can implement something like this, in the core of
> > myFaces for backwards navigation!
> >  
> > "Use the code
> > The best way to start with the WFNM is to look at the 
> sample provided
> > with the framework itself at the project's Web site (see 
> Resources): it 
> > is the complete scenario described in this article. It is largely 
> > self-explanatory and can be used as a template for 
> developing other Web 
> > applications. The sample contains two different versions of 
> the complete 
> > scenario shown above: the first is implemented using WFNM 
> in conjunction 
> > with Struts, the second is implemented in conjunction with 
> JavaServer 
> > Faces."
> >  
> > What you (myFaces team) think about it?
> >  
> > P.S. Do you know for other technique to manage backwards navigation
> > within myFaces?
> >  
> 

Reply via email to