When we attempted to pull down down from the incubator CVS, it
redirected us to the sourceforge CVS.  Since sourceforge supports HTTP
proxying, its easier for us to pull from there.

Is that the wrong thing to do?  I just pulled from there yesterday and
everything is still under the same package structure.


On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:00:59 -0600, Heath Borders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will do that from now on.  I still have one more patch that needs
> committing: MYFACES-6.  When I submitted the issue, I submitted the
> line of code to fix, but I noticed yesterday that it was never closed,
> so I included the whole file.  Since its part of the JSF API, package
> structuring shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> Once this is committed, I should be working with the same codebase asa
> you guys have.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:48:43 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Heath,
> > I just committed both of your patches.
> > Kind request: Please submit future patches only for the latest CVS
> > version. The patches still had net.sourceforge.myfaces as package.
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Heath Borders wrote:
> > > I have removed this logic and am submitting a bug with the new code.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:31:24 -0600, Heath Borders
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Why does the PropertyResolverImpl have special logic for instances of
> > >>UIComponent?  There is nothing in the spec about this and the RI code
> > >>doesn't do this either.
> > >>
> > >>This is causing problems for our code because we use a UIComponent as
> > >>a data bean to hold presentation data.  This bean is not bound to a
> > >>tag, but is used in a ValueBinding to an attribute:
> > >>"#{guiBean.titleComponent.value}".  The PropertyResolverImpl never
> > >>finds the value of the "value" property of the UIComponent because of
> > >>special non-spec logic for UIComponents.
> > >>
> > >>What will happen if I take this logic out?
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>If you don't have a GMail account, I probably have 5 invites.  Just ask!
> > >>-Heath Borders-Wing
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> If you don't have a GMail account, I probably have 5 invites.  Just ask!
> -Heath Borders-Wing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
If you don't have a GMail account, I probably have 5 invites.  Just ask!
-Heath Borders-Wing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to