I'm in favor of doing this, though I don't think I'll have much time at work to dedicate to it since we're not really aching for the change. If I get some time, I'll try to do something, but I can't really commit to it.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:59:15 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you wanted to be more familiar to Struts users, you might consider > using "styleId" instead ... that's the attribute all the Struts HTML > tags use to specify the "id" attribute to be emitted. > > Craig > > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:47:55 -0500, Sean Schofield > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A possible solution would be to implement direct id's (that is any id > > > specified in the JSP translates into the same client id) in the > > > MyFaces extended components. > > > > > > We could provide a separate attribute on all extended components > > > called "directId". If specified, directId would be both the id and > > > the clientId. In order to ensure uniqueness, we would have to have > > > all components register their directId's with the view root. > > > > > > This would allow backwards compatibility with existing code and allow > > > easy direct access to the clientId from the JSP without a separate > > > tag. > > > > That would be an extremely welcome enhancement. Although I imagine it > > would take a bit of work to get it done :-) > > > > > -Heath Borders-Wing > > > > sean > > > -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
