How exactly are you going to track a window?
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:37:18 -0800, Travis Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Definitely. I would also try to make it so that in faces-config.xml you > could set > <managed-bean-scope>window</managed-bean-scope> > > I think windowScope is a better term for this or frameScope rather than > pageFlowScope because window or frame is more what it actually is. > > Travis > > > Heath Borders wrote: > +1! ADF missed a big feature, though. We should make a custom variable > resolver that automatically checks the pageFlowScope Map for a variable name > AFTER checking all the other scopes as required by the JSF spec. This would > mean that you wouldn't have to prepend "pageFlowScope." onto all of your > variable names. Also the <setActionListener /> sounds handy as well. On Mon, > 3 Jan 2005 00:11:37 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Travis, I just read the article and think it is a fine concept. Also their > <setActionListener/> is nice. It prevents developers from some work on > creating *detail* pages, as pointed out in the article. So here is my +1 on > that! Matthias -----Original Message----- From: Travis Reeder > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:42 > PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: New Scope It looks like the smart > people over at Oracle already implemented my idea in ADF, they call it > pageFlowScope: http://tinyurl.com/5jwdc Implemented almost exactly the same > way I had proposed. Anyone opposed to working a new optional scope into my > faces? I volunteer if everyone's ok with it because I really badly need > this. Travis Stefan Langer wrote: Travis Reeder wrote: What do you guys > think of this? > http://www.crack3r.com/2004/12/another-scope-for-web-app-parameters.html I > don't think this will work since there is no concept of a window in the http > protocol. How does the server know that a new window has been opened? Unless > the client tells it which currently it doesn't. So how do you decide when to > create and when to destroy the window scope? I think the idea of Korhonen > seems more practical although I quite don't see how to implement the > deserialization behaviour in a consistent mannor without being corruptible > by the client. Just my two cents Stefan -- Travis Reeder Ecommstats Web > Analytics www.ecommstats.com > -- Travis Reeder Ecommstats Web Analytics www.ecommstats.com -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
