I'm starting to think I will have a need for this x:script tag as
well. We'll be anxiously awaiting it ;-)
sean
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:07:17 -0600, Heath Borders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still want to do it. Basically the last month has been crunch time
> at work, so I haven't had any free time to pursue it. I have
> forgotten about it, and I plan on working on it this weekend if I
> finish my project, next weekend if I have to burn myself out working.
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:04:58 -0800 (PST), Ray Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Heath:
> >
> > What ever happened to your <x:script> tag? Where do
> > you stand on that?
> >
> > Thanks Ray
> >
> > --- Heath Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > We've been using a J4J component that writes out a
> > > proxy id. Since
> > > we're developing all of our javascript from scratch,
> > > its not really a
> > > big deal. You could use the same library, its open
> > > source.
> > >
> > > However, once Sean's forceId changes go through its
> > > going to be a MUCH
> > > better experience.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:43:55 -0500, Sean Schofield
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Calling the submit() on the form should work. One
> > > thing you will have
> > > > to be careful about though is that if you are used
> > > to using the
> > > > javascript getElementById method you may run into
> > > some trouble. Do a
> > > > search on earlier posts of this thread for
> > > "getElementById" and you
> > > > will see what I am talking about.
> > > >
> > > > We have a solution for that problem which is a
> > > "forceId" attribute.
> > > > Currently there is not one for form, but
> > > eventually I will add it once
> > > > there is some other need to create an extended
> > > version of the form tag
> > > > for something else.
> > > >
> > > > If you are not using Tiles or dynamic includes, it
> > > will be relatively
> > > > easy to know the id attribute of the form element
> > > so you may just want
> > > > to hard-code that into your javascript.
> > > >
> > > > Just out of curiosity, why are you not just making
> > > your search button
> > > > a <h:commandButton> instead? Seems like that
> > > would be much easier ...
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:13:15 -0600, Heath Borders
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Your page would most likely have to submit the
> > > form in order for this
> > > > > to happen. Generally, this adds up to a poor
> > > user experience. We've
> > > > > been experimenting with the XmlHttpRequest
> > > Object that has yielded
> > > > > some amazing results.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:49:13 -0500, Matt
> > > Crockett 8441
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Not really a MyFaces specific question... Is
> > > there a way for a
> > > > > > JavaScript event handler to call an action
> > > event?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Specifically I would like to call
> > > action="#{contactManager.doSearch}"
> > > > > > when an 'onkeyup' event is recognized.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt Crockett
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -Heath Borders-Wing
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Heath Borders-Wing
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
> --
> -Heath Borders-Wing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
