<f:param> definitely works.  I used it in an example where I had
several <h:commandLink> items in a table.  It will put the parameter
in the request map as promised.    I would double check your example.

sean

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:51:00 -0800 (PST), mfaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a List box and a command button:
> 
> List box:
> <h:selectOneListbox id="document" value="#{sessionData.selectedDocumentId}"
> size="5" style="width: 300px;" required="true" >
>   <f:selectItems id="documentItem" 
> value="#{sessionData.documentSelectItems}"/>
> </h:selectOneListbox>
> 
> Command Button:
> <h:commandButton action="#{sessionData.editAction}"
> value="#{msg.common_edit}"
> actionListener="#{sessionData.currentDocumentListen}" >
>   <f:param name="id" value="#{sessionData.selectedDocumentId}"/>
> </h:commandButton>
> 
> When I check the contents of the parameter map on the next page I get:
> 
> 10:35:14,634 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - jsf_state_64 = H4sIAAAAAAAAALVae2...
> 10:35:14,634 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - _id1:_link_hidden_ =
> 10:35:14,634 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - _id1:_id21 = Edit
> 10:35:14,634 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - _id1_SUBMIT = 1
> 10:35:14,644 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - jsf_tree_64 = H4sIAAAAAA...
> 10:35:14,644 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - jsf_viewid = /pages/main.jsp
> 10:35:14,644 DEBUG NasaGeneralBean:? - _id1:document = 1
> 
> As you can see there is no 'id' param being passed.
> 
> The value for the 'document' param is also strange because
> sessionData.selectedDocumentId was changed
> in the currentDocumentListen method before the edit action executed so it
> would be reasonable to assume that the 'document' param should contain the
> new value for sessionData.selectedDocumentId
> 
> The edit action was responsible for providing the outcome that set
> navigation to this page.
> 
> It seems the value for 'document' is not being set by the actionListener or
> the original value is being passed in the request for some strange reason.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated, all I want to do is pass a parameter in the
> request, it shouldn't be this hard.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Mark
> 
>

Reply via email to